Sell Resources

State Water Resources Control Board Knowledge Base

If you understand the meaning of the modern progressive movement, why would you be for it? General Interest, 1924 Certainly the most successful third party in the immediate post-World War I era was the Progressive effort led by Senator Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin. The end of the war had seen an upsurge in left-wing political activity in the United States, as evidenced in the growth and development of the Workers’ Party (the Communists), the Socialist Party and the Farmer-Labor Party, all of which increased their ranks at the beginning of the 1920s. Also making an impact at this time was the Conference for Progressive Political Action (C.P.P.A.), which in 1922 merged the efforts of several railway unions into a surprisingly effective state and local political force. They successfully backed a number of liberal candidates in Congressional races and had visions of greater success in 1924. The C.P.P.A. held a national nominating convention in Cleveland, Ohio, that year and concluded that their best hope of gaining real influence would come through backing a candidate with a national reputation. La Follette fit the bill, but he was leery of Communist influence in left-wing political parties and styled himself an Independent. He was, however, enticed to accept the Progressive nomination by being given full control over the party platform and the choice of his running mate. The C.P.P.A., in many ways heir to the defunct Bull Moose or Progressive Party of Teddy Roosevelt, offered a platform in 1924 that was only marginally more socialistic than the statement issued a dozen years earlier. La Follette called for: * Government Ownership. Citing mismanagement by private enterprise, the Progressives called for government ownership of the nation's railroads, timber forests, coal, ore and oil fields, and power-generating water resources. * Tax Reform. Arguing that the middle and lower classes shouldered a disproportionate amount of the tax burden, the Progressives called for a lowering of tax rates for those groups and sharp increases for the wealthy. * Agricultural Reform. Support was voiced for a variety of government programs designed to relieve the distress of American farmers, who were contending with the related problems of overproduction and low prices. * Judicial Reform. The Progressives argued that middle class and working Americans were harmed by overactive courts that overturned the legislative efforts of a well-meaning Congress and state assemblies. Limitations were urged on judicial review and on the use of injunctions. The Socialists, Farmer-Labor Party and a variety of labor organizations climbed on board with La Follette, which broadened the movement into what was generally termed the Progressive Party. The Workers’ Party offered its support, but was turned down. In the November election, La Follette polled nearly five million votes and carried his home state, but was easily outdistanced by the major parties. The Progressive Party unraveled quickly following the election defeat in 1924, but it staged a comeback in the 1930s on the state level in Wisconsin where La Follette’s sons, Robert Jr. and Philip, forged a successful movement that lasted until the end of World War II.
RAJ THAKRE IS VICTIM OF CONSPRINCY OF STUPID AMARSINGH – LALOO YADAV & PASWAN ? Raj Thakre is not given any Statement against any Community / Cast / Religion / Region, There are No reason of his arrest? The Constitution of India has conferred a right to all citizens of India to migrate anywhere within the Country and earn their livelihood, and this has been constantly hammered by all the selfish politicians through media and other sources. But one fact is being wilfully concealed by them, that the State Government has authority to restrict such migrations in the interest of citizens of the state. The uncontrollable migrations may result into grave consequences in future in form of shortages of Water supply , electricity supply, food grains, and other resources, immense growth of hutments/slums, pressure on public transport, traffic jams, environmental degradation and so on......... It is the duty of State Govt. of Maharashtra to take all possible measures to control migrations and protect the state. FACTS OF RAILWAY BOARD EXAMS  COMPULSION •This is the legal compulsion for Indian Railways that Exams would be conduct within the Maharashtra because Selected Candidates will have an appointment in Maharashtra region (railways) only. ACTS •Exams notification has given by Railway in Hindi newspapers of entire Bihar & Uttar Pradesh & English newspapers in Mumbai (Not even entire Maharashtra) nor in Marathi (local language of Maharashtra) by overlooking the fact that the Selected Candidates will have appointment in Maharashtra region (railways) only Union Railway Minister Laloo Prasad Yadav & his associates instigated youths of Bihar & Uttar Pradesh to participate in Railway board exams will be conducting in Mumbai.  Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav instructed railway authorities not to force for railway ticket to peoples coming from UP & Bihar for appearing in railway board exams and his associates distributed Rs.1000/- per person for pocket expenses & the compensation of their loss of work. Mr. Kripa Shankar Singh, Mr. Abu Azmi & others the leaders of Laloo’s Party (RJD) in Mumbai wing conduct the close door meetings with associations of north Indians residing in Mumbai, and distributed Application forms of railway board exams going to be conduct. And Party workers of RJD in Mumbai had assisted the applicants to fill & deposit the same with Railway Board. RESULT Out of 872 persons appearing in exams, 831 persons belongs to Bihar & UP, 24 persons from the remaining part of the North India, only 17 persons participation from Maharashtra. Party workers of MNS Inform this facts to party supremo Mr. Raj Thakre, Mr. Thakre Inquired the same with Railway authorities Mumbai, the officials replied that they act as per Ministerial orders In turn of injustice done, angry MNS party workers gone to examination centre and oppose it, tension prevailed & unforeseen incidents took place. HOW THE REGIONLISM ABUESD BY TAMIL’S 1.They ensured that all communications are in Tamil (in bus, train, roads) 2.They ensured that central govt. communications are also in Tamils (train, post office etc) 3.They ensured that no Hindi school, colleges, teachings etc are in TN 4.They ensured that only Tamil newspaper, TV channels will be available. 5.They ensured that only a Tamil will be become a MP, MLA, or in position of power. 6.They ensured that if you want to stay in TN, stay below us, speak our language or else get out. 7.And it is done so beautifully without any violence. 8.By doing all these, they have effectively stopped anyone from "North" or rest of India. NO ACTION AGAINST TAMIL LEADERS I request to the Citizens of India think that if same concprerincy will be done with the capital of state they belongs, what will be their responce? and if any body had any ethentic proof that Mr. Raj Thakre said any single word aginst any Community / Cast / Religion / Region, OR Nation. Please Mail to me I withdraw my stand.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers